| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |  | 
 
           WATER TREATMENT LEVELS
           Quality of Water Treatment & Use of Treated Water
	      Since Biosphere 2, over 100 WWG systems have been installed worldwide 
            with purifying results still as effective:
 
	90-95% BOD reduction (Biological Oxygen Demand)90-95 % TSS reduction (Total Suspended Solid reduction)45-80% Nitrogen reduction - This ratio varies greatly in regards to local conditions and time of test.30-60% Phosphorus reduction - The same variability of ratio as in Nitrogen can be observed.Over 98% Coliform bacteria reduction
 
            If the effluent coming out of the WWG unit/s 
              is to be further used for subsurface irrigation, the waters will 
              know a secondary nutrient uptake process and thus meet even higher 
              standards at final discharge.
 
            While the treated water discharged from the Wastewater 
              Gardens® is highly reduced in 
              bacteria, it is not up to drinking standards as we normally don't 
              use a final disinfectant such as chlorine or ultra-violet lights. 
              This means that you can grow and eat fruits and some types of medicinal 
              plants for example, or grow fodder for animals, but shouldn't plant 
              leafy vegetables destined to human or animal consumption.The discharge water could also be used for flushing toilets but 
              the cost of pumping it back into houses usually makes this option 
              uneconomical.
 
 Examples of laboratory water analyses of water froma WWG treatment unit
(Birdwood Downs homestead, Derby, West Australia)
 
  
 Another example of water laboratory analysis of a WWG treatment unit
 (Krempna, Poland)
 
  
 
	|  |  
	| Parameter | Influent concentration | Effluent concentration | Required level by health authorities
 |  
	|  |  
	| DBO5 | 55,0 mg O2/l | 11,0 mg O2/l | 40 mg O2/l |  
	| COD | 88,0 mg O2/l | 32,0 mg O2/l | 150 mg O2/l |  
	| TSS | 74,5 mg/l | 49,5 mg/l | 50 mg/l |  
	| Total N | 73,7 mg N/l | 24,6 mg N/l | 30 mg N/l |  
	| Total P | 7,2 mg P/l | 2,0 mg P/l | 5 mg P/l |  
	|  |  
 Comparison of principal parameters removal efficiency of Wastewater 
        Gardens® subsurface flow systems with 
        average North American surface and subsurface flow wetlands (based on 
        data from early prototypes in Mexico) and EPA study.
 
  
 
 Summary of Water Quality Tests at Emu Creek (Gulgagulganeng)
 Wastewater Garden System, Kununurra, West Australia, August 2002 - May 2004
 
  
 
	|  |  
	| Parameter | BOD-5 (Biochemical
 Oxygen Demand)
 mg/l
 | Total Suspended Solids
 (TSS)
 mg/l
 | Total Nitrogen
 mg/l
 | Total Phosphorus
 mg/l
 |  
	|  |  
	| Average in Septic Tank | 214 | 99 | 228 | 18 |  
	| Average Wastewater Garden
 discharge
 | 23 | 10 | 66 | 7.8 |  
	| Percent Reduction | 89% | 90% | 73% | 58% |  
	|  |   Tests performed at MPL Laboratories, Perth, an accredited testing facility. If evapotranspiration is 20% for above system, then wetland reduction of BOD is 91%, Reduction of TSS is 92%, reduction of nitrogen is 77% and reduction of P is 65%.
 
 
 Average influent and effluent concentration (mg/l) and removal efficiencies (%) of organics (BOD5) in horizontal, subsurface flow constructed wetlands
 
  
 
	|  |  
	| Country | Influent concentration | Effluent concentration | Efficiency |  
	|  |  
	| Czech Republic | 87,2 | 10,5 | 88,0 |  
	| Denmark and UK | 97,0 | 13,1 | 86,5 |  
	| North America | 27,5 | 8,6 | 68,5 |  
	| Germany - L. Saxony | 248 | 42 | 83,0 |  
	| Germany - Bavaria | 106 | 21,6 | 79,6 |  
	| Poland | 7,65 | 4,10 | 46,4 |  
	| Slovenia | 107 | 11,3 | 89,0 |  
	| Sweden | 80,5 | 5,9 | 92,7 |  
	|  |  
 Average influent and effluent concentration (mg/l) and removal efficiencies (%) of suspended solids in horizontal, subsurface flow constructed wetlands
 
  
 
	|  |  
	| Country | Influent concentration | Effluent concentration | Efficiency |  
	|  |  
	| Czech Republic | 64,8 | 10,2 | 84,3 |  
	| Denmark and UK | 98,6 | 13,6 | 86,2 |  
	| North America | 48,2 | 10,3 | 78,6 |  
	| Poland | 140 | 38,6 | 77,4 |  
	|  |  Recent testing of early systems implemented along the Yucatan coast 
          in Mexico indicated reduced levels of performance due to a lack of proper 
          garden maintenance, with shading of understory plants, lack of aeration 
          and possibly short-circuiting of wastewater. System performance can 
          be improved through enhanced planting of the systems especially with 
          robust and deep-rooted wetland species; regular pruning to prevent tall 
          vegetation out-competing shorter species; and through reuse of the treated 
          water for further irrigation. Newer systems have been designed with 
          longer length: width ratios to increase wastewater residence time in 
          the wetlands and with greater end-use of the water for increasing total 
          system treatment and water reuse. For applications requiring even higher 
          initial treatment standards, use of "vertical flow" wetlands with dosing 
          siphons or pumps to batch load an initial wetland compartment will increase 
          aeration and thus boost treatment levels.
 
 
 
 |